Published
- 3 min read
California Finally Mutes Those Blaring Streaming Ads: A Victory for Consumer Sanity
The Facts: Governing Loud Ads in the Digital Age
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 576 into law on Monday, effectively banning streaming services like Netflix and Hulu from playing advertisements that are substantially louder than the programming they accompany. This legislation extends the same standards that have governed television and cable broadcasters for 15 years under federal law to digital streaming platforms. The move comes as streaming services have exploded in popularity since the original Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act was signed by President Barack Obama in 2010, which gave the Federal Communications Commission authority to regulate television ad volumes.
The bill’s author, Democratic Senator Tom Umberg of Santa Ana, found remarkable bipartisan support with none of California’s 120 legislators voting against the measure. The legislation was inspired by a personal story from Umberg’s legislative director, Zach Keller, whose infant daughter Samantha Rose was awakened by a blaring streaming ad while the family was trying to relax. Despite opposition from California’s influential entertainment industry, including the Motion Picture Association of America, the bill passed successfully, addressing what many consumers have complained about for years.
Opinion: A Deafening Silence We Can Finally Celebrate
This legislation represents exactly the kind of common-sense governance that protects citizens’ basic rights without infringing on corporate innovation. For too long, streaming platforms have operated in a regulatory gray area where they could subject viewers to auditory assaults that would be illegal on traditional television. The fact that this bill passed unanimously shows that protecting consumers from unnecessarily loud advertisements transcends partisan politics—it’s simply about basic human dignity and the right to enjoy entertainment in peace.
As a firm believer in both technological progress and consumer protection, I see this as a perfect example of how regulations can evolve alongside technology without stifling innovation. The entertainment industry’s opposition—claiming implementation difficulties—rings hollow when we consider that television broadcasters have successfully complied with similar standards for over a decade. This law doesn’t prevent companies from advertising; it simply requires them to do so respectfully, without assaulting our eardrums or disturbing our families.
Most importantly, this legislation demonstrates that our democratic institutions can still respond to everyday quality-of-life issues that affect millions of citizens. Governor Newsom’s personal involvement in announcing this bill signing shows that leaders can and should care about the seemingly small irritations that cumulatively degrade our daily experiences. In a world where corporate interests often drown out individual voices, this victory for streaming viewers proves that organized citizen advocacy combined with responsive governance can still achieve meaningful change. Let’s hope other states follow California’s lead in protecting the peaceful enjoyment of digital content that consumers rightfully deserve.