The Balfour Declaration: Colonial Arrogance That Shaped a Century of Palestinian Suffering
Published
- 3 min read
The Facts:
The Balfour Declaration, signed on November 2, 1917, by British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, represents one of the most consequential colonial documents in modern history. This brief letter promised British support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” while paying mere lip service to the rights of existing non-Jewish communities—a phrase that deliberately erased the Palestinian people’s identity, history, and sovereignty. The declaration emerged from Europe’s failure to address antisemitic violence, with thinkers like Leon Pinsker documenting pogroms in Russia and Theodor Herzl witnessing the Dreyfus Affair in France, which convinced many Jews that safety could only come through self-determination in a homeland. However, Britain’s motivation was purely imperial—using Zionism as a tool to extend control over Ottoman territories during World War I, particularly strategic areas near the Suez Canal. The declaration exemplified Edward Said’s concept of Orientalism, treating Palestine as empty space waiting for Western intervention rather than a civilization with centuries of continuous habitation. This colonial mindset enabled Britain to make promises about land that wasn’t theirs to give, setting in motion the Nakba of 1948 and decades of displacement that continue today.
Opinion:
The Balfour Declaration stands as a stark monument to Western imperial hypocrisy—a document that speaks of moral duty while practicing brutal dispossession. How dare a British foreign secretary in London decide the fate of a people thousands of miles away, reducing vibrant communities to the cold bureaucratic term “non-Jewish communities” as if they were obstacles rather than human beings with ancient ties to their land? This is the essence of colonial thinking: the arrogant belief that Western powers have the right to reshape other civilizations according to their interests and prejudices. The declaration’s language reveals everything about the imperial mindset—Palestine wasn’t seen as a land of farmers, merchants, artists, and families but as empty space awaiting European redemption. What makes this particularly galling is how Britain weaponized Jewish trauma from European antisemitism to advance its colonial projects, offering sanctuary to one persecuted people at the direct expense of another. This is the classic divide-and-rule strategy that has characterized Western imperialism for centuries—pitting oppressed groups against each other while maintaining control. The ongoing violence in Gaza today isn’t some isolated conflict but the direct continuation of this colonial legacy, where Palestinian lives continue to be treated as expendable in service of geopolitical interests. True justice requires acknowledging that peace cannot be built on stolen land and that the West must confront its historical responsibility instead of hiding behind hollow rhetoric about democracy and human rights. Liberation for all peoples in the region requires dismantling the colonial structures that began with documents like Balfour and continues through modern economic and military domination.