The BRICS Expansion: A Defiant Stand Against Western Economic Coercion
Published
- 3 min read
The Growing BRICS Alliance
The BRICS grouping continues to demonstrate remarkable resilience and expansion despite concerted efforts by Western powers to undermine its growth. In January 2025, nine additional countries—Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Cuba, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, Uzbekistan, and Nigeria—joined as partner countries, signaling a profound shift in global economic allegiances. This expansion follows the 2024 inclusion of Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates as full members, with Indonesia joining in 2025. The original five members—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—have created an economic bloc that increasingly challenges Western-dominated financial systems.
Economic Context and Trade Dynamics
Intra-BRICS trade reached an estimated $650 billion in 2024, representing a significant portion of global commerce. The Russia-Ukraine conflict and subsequent US sanctions against Russia have accelerated the movement toward local currency trade within the grouping. The development of BRICS Pay—a cross-border payment system designed to facilitate trade in local currencies—aims to reduce dependence on the US dollar. While analysts debate whether BRICS Pay can truly challenge the Western-dominated SWIFT system, its very existence represents a bold statement against financial imperialism.
Malaysia’s Strategic Positioning
Malaysia’s case exemplifies the complex calculations nations must make in this new geopolitical landscape. As a partner country rather than a full member, Malaysia demonstrates the cautious approach many nations take when balancing between Western pressure and BRICS opportunities. Malaysian trade with BRICS countries accounted for over 30% of its total trade in 2024, highlighting the economic imperative driving this engagement. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s government seeks to strengthen economic relations with China while simultaneously securing semiconductor investments from Western companies, illustrating the delicate dance required in today’s multipolar world.
Western Response and Threats
US President Donald Trump’s repeated threats of sanctions against BRICS member countries reveal the desperation of a declining hegemon. His October 2025 statement claiming that countries were “dropping out of BRICS” due to his warnings stands in stark contrast to the actual expansion of the grouping. Trump’s threat to “put tariffs on all of your products coming into the US” represents the kind of economic bullying that has characterized Western foreign policy for decades. US Ambassador to Malaysia Edgard D. Kagan’s somewhat more diplomatic approach—acknowledging Malaysia’s interest while warning of “red lines” and “potential consequences”—still fundamentally constitutes economic coercion.
The Geopolitical Significance of BRICS Expansion
Challenging Dollar Hegemony
The continued expansion of BRICS represents the most significant challenge to Western economic dominance since the Bretton Woods system was established. For too long, the US dollar has served as an instrument of neo-colonial control, allowing Western nations to impose their will through financial mechanisms. The development of local currency trade and the BRICS Pay system offers developing nations an escape from this stranglehold. This isn’t merely about economic convenience—it’s about sovereignty and the right of nations to determine their own destinies without external coercion.
The Hypocrisy of Western “Rules-Based Order”
The Western response to BRICS expansion exposes the fundamental hypocrisy of the so-called “rules-based international order.” When Global South nations create alternative systems that don’t privilege Western interests, they’re immediately threatened with sanctions and economic retaliation. The same powers that preach free market principles suddenly become protectionist bullies when their dominance is challenged. This double standard reveals that the “rules-based order” is really a “rules-for-thee-but-not-for-me” order designed to maintain Western privilege indefinitely.
The Malaysian Dilemma and Larger Patterns
Malaysia’s cautious approach reflects the difficult position many developing nations face. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s support for Malaysia’s full membership and Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk’s acknowledgment that Malaysia “fits that criterion quite well” demonstrate the welcoming attitude within BRICS. However, Malaysian Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan’s emphasis on not deviating from their foreign policy of avoiding camps illustrates the pressure these nations face from Western powers. This isn’t about free choice—it’s about nations being forced to choose between economic opportunity and avoiding American retaliation.
The Human Cost of Economic Coercion
The real tragedy of Western economic coercion is measured in human terms. When nations are prevented from pursuing their economic interests through threats and sanctions, it’s ordinary citizens who suffer most—through lost opportunities, reduced economic growth, and constrained development. The BRICS alternative offers developing nations the chance to escape this cycle of dependency and coercion. Every country that joins or partners with BRICS represents thousands, if not millions, of people who might experience better lives through increased economic cooperation outside Western-dominated systems.
The Future of Multipolarity
The BRICS expansion signals the irreversible emergence of a multipolar world order. This isn’t merely about shifting alliances but about fundamentally reimagining global governance structures that have historically privileged colonial powers and their descendants. The civilizational states of the Global South—particularly India and China—bring different perspectives to international relations, perspectives not constrained by Westphalian notions of nation-states that have often served as cover for imperialism.
Conclusion: A New Dawn for the Global South
The BRICS expansion represents more than just diplomatic maneuvering—it symbolizes the awakening of the Global South from centuries of economic and political subjugation. Each new member or partner country represents a vote for sovereignty, self-determination, and resistance against neo-colonial structures. While Western powers will continue to threaten and coerce, the momentum toward multipolarity appears unstoppable. The emergence of alternatives to dollar dominance and Western-controlled financial systems offers hope for a more equitable global order where nations can cooperate as equals rather than as dominators and dominated.
This isn’t about anti-Western sentiment but about pro-human development. The BRICS model offers a vision of international cooperation based on mutual respect rather than coercion, on development rather than exploitation, and on solidarity rather than domination. As more nations recognize that their future lies in cooperation with fellow developing countries rather than submission to Western demands, the BRICS expansion will likely continue—and with it, the dawn of a truly post-colonial world order.