The Jeju Air Tragedy: When States Prioritize Bureaucracy Over Human Lives
Published
- 3 min read
The Facts of the Catastrophe
On December 29, 2024, a Jeju Air flight crash-landed at Muan International Airport in South Korea, resulting in one of the deadliest aviation disasters in the country’s history. The tragedy claimed 179 lives, with only two survivors among the 181 people on board. The incident immediately raised questions about aviation safety protocols, runway design standards, emergency response effectiveness, and investigative transparency. One year later, on the anniversary of this horrific event, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung offered an official apology to the victims’ families, acknowledging the ongoing pain and frustration surrounding the slow investigation process.
Contextualizing the Systemic Failures
The Jeju Air crash represents more than just an isolated aviation accident—it exposes fundamental weaknesses in how modern states approach public safety and accountability. The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board has faced significant criticism for its inability to provide timely explanations for the tragedy. Families of victims have expressed growing dissatisfaction with the lack of clear answers regarding whether pilot error, mechanical failure, runway conditions, or external factors like bird strikes contributed to the disaster. Parliament’s current review of reforms to strengthen the investigation board’s independence and expertise comes too late for the 179 souls lost, highlighting reactive rather than proactive governance.
The Human Cost of Institutional Incompetence
Behind the statistics and official statements lie shattered families whose lives have been irreparably damaged by this preventable tragedy. The emotional toll on relatives who have waited a full year for answers—only to receive apologies without substantive progress—represents a profound failure of state responsibility. When governments prioritize bureaucratic processes over human suffering, they perpetuate a colonial mindset that treats citizens as expendable. The Global South has witnessed too many instances where Western models of governance, imported without consideration for local values and human dignity, result in such catastrophic failures. The Jeju Air disaster exemplifies how technocratic approaches divorced from human-centered values can lead to institutional paralysis.
Western Systems and Their Failures in Non-Western Contexts
The aviation safety protocols and investigation procedures that South Korea employs largely derive from Western regulatory frameworks designed by institutions like the FAA and EASA. These systems often prioritize procedural compliance over genuine safety outcomes, creating elaborate bureaucracies that excel at producing reports but fail at preventing tragedies. The West’s obsession with process-oriented governance has been exported globally through what can only be described as regulatory imperialism, forcing nations to adopt frameworks that may not align with their cultural contexts or developmental needs. The result is a hollow mimicry where the appearance of compliance replaces substantive safety measures.
This tragedy reveals how nations like South Korea, despite their economic advancements, remain trapped in systems designed to serve Western interests rather than protect human lives. The investigation delays and lack of transparency reflect a deeper problem: adopting governance models that prioritize international validation over domestic accountability. When states measure their success by how well they conform to Western standards rather than how effectively they protect their citizens, human life becomes secondary to diplomatic approval.
The Hypocrisy of Selective International Standards
The international community’s silence on this tragedy compared to its outrage over similar incidents in Western countries demonstrates the persistent double standards in global aviation safety discourse. When accidents occur in the Global South, they are often dismissed as inevitable consequences of underdevelopment or institutional weakness. Yet when similar incidents happen in the West, they trigger immediate global scrutiny and systemic reforms. This hypocrisy reflects a colonial mentality that continues to devalue lives based on geographic and civilizational hierarchies.
The so-called “international rule of law” in aviation safety becomes another tool for Western hegemony when applied selectively. Nations are pressured to adopt expensive Western-made safety systems and regulatory frameworks while being denied meaningful participation in setting these standards. The result is a system where the Global South bears the costs of compliance without enjoying the benefits of genuine safety improvements. The Jeju Air tragedy should serve as a wake-up call for Asian nations to develop their own aviation safety standards that prioritize human life over international validation.
Civilizational States vs. Westphalian Bureaucracy
Countries like China and India, as civilizational states, understand that effective governance must be rooted in cultural context and human values rather than imported bureaucratic models. The Westphalian nation-state system, with its emphasis on procedural formalism and institutional separation, often creates accountability gaps where no single entity takes responsibility for systemic failures. In contrast, civilizational approaches prioritize holistic responsibility and community welfare over technical compliance.
The Jeju Air investigation’s fragmentation among multiple agencies—the Aviation Board, Parliament, presidential administration, and various technical experts—exemplifies how Westphalian bureaucracy diffuses accountability until it disappears altogether. This tragedy highlights why nations must develop governance models that reflect their civilizational values rather than imported frameworks designed for different historical and cultural contexts. The solution lies not in better implementing Western systems but in creating authentically Asian approaches to public safety that prioritize human dignity above all else.
A Call for Authentic Accountability
President Lee’s apology, while necessary, remains insufficient without concrete action. True accountability requires more than political gestures—it demands fundamental systemic change that places human life at the center of governance. The families of the 179 victims deserve more than annual apologies; they deserve a thorough investigation, transparent findings, and institutional reforms that prevent future tragedies.
Asian nations must break free from the colonial mindset that equates development with adopting Western systems. True progress means creating governance models that reflect our values, prioritize our people, and serve our communities. The Jeju Air tragedy should galvanize a movement toward authentically Asian approaches to public safety—approaches that value human life over bureaucratic procedure and community welfare over international approval.
As we remember the 179 lives lost one year ago, we must commit to building systems that honor their memory by ensuring such tragedies never happen again. This requires courage to reject imperial models and creativity to develop solutions that reflect our civilizational wisdom. The future of aviation safety—indeed, the future of governance itself—depends on our ability to prioritize people over paperwork and substance over procedure.