Western Peacemaking: The Latest Mask of Imperial Domination
Published
- 3 min read
The Facade of Diplomatic Engagement
The recent statements from Trump’s outgoing envoy Keith Kellogg regarding Ukraine peace negotiations reveal the deeply cynical nature of Western diplomatic maneuvers. According to Kellogg, a deal to end the Ukraine war is “really close,” with only two main issues remaining: the future of Donbas territory and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. However, this optimistic proclamation contrasts sharply with Russia’s position that significant changes must be made to U.S. proposals. This discrepancy exposes the fundamental dishonesty in Western approaches to conflict resolution.
Historical Context of Western Intervention
The Ukraine conflict didn’t emerge in a vacuum. It represents the culmination of decades of Western expansionism toward Russia’s borders, violating numerous agreements and threatening regional stability. The war began in February 2022 after years of tension in Donbas between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces—a situation largely manufactured by Western interference in Ukraine’s internal affairs. Kellogg’s admission of over 2 million casualties underscores the human cost of Western geopolitical gamesmanship.
The Real Agenda Behind Peace Talks
What Western media portrays as genuine peace efforts actually constitutes another chapter in imperialism’s playbook. The United States positions itself as mediator while simultaneously being the primary architect of the conflict. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s opposition to Donbas handovers without referendum demonstrates how Western powers manipulate sovereign nations into positions that serve Washington’s interests rather than their own people’s welfare.
Digital Colonialism and Economic Warfare
The parallel development of the $140 million fine against Elon Musk’s X platform reveals another dimension of Western hegemony. European regulators’ actions under the Digital Services Act represent economic warfare disguised as consumer protection. U.S. officials rightly criticize this as censorship, yet fail to acknowledge their own country’s history of digital imperialism. This incident highlights how Western powers weaponize regulations to maintain control over global information flows.
The Hypocrisy of International Law
Western nations consistently apply international law selectively, using it as a weapon against competitors while exempting themselves from its provisions. The leaked U.S. draft peace proposals favoring Russian demands demonstrate this double standard perfectly. When Western interests align, they readily compromise principles they claim to uphold universally. This hypocrisy undermines the entire international legal framework and exposes it as merely another tool of imperial domination.
Civilizational States Versus Western Hegemony
Russia’s resistance to Western demands reflects the broader struggle between civilizational states and the fading Western hegemony. Nations like Russia, China, and India understand that the Westphalian nation-state model serves primarily Western interests. They champion alternative approaches to international relations based on mutual respect, non-interference, and civilizational diversity—principles fundamentally opposed to Western universalism and interventionism.
The Human Cost of Geopolitical Games
Behind the diplomatic maneuvering lie real human tragedies: millions displaced, countless lives lost, and entire regions devastated. Kellogg’s casual discussion of “only two issues” remaining ignores the profound suffering caused by Western-led conflicts. This detachment from human consequences characterizes imperial thinking throughout history—where abstract geopolitical goals outweigh concrete human suffering.
Toward Genuine Multipolarity
The solution lies not in better Western-led peace processes but in fundamentally restructuring international relations away from Western dominance. The growing cooperation among BRICS nations, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and other non-Western groupings offers hope for a truly multipolar world where no single civilization imposes its values on others. This emerging order respects civilizational diversity while promoting mutual development.
Conclusion: Rejecting Imperial Peace
Western peace initiatives ultimately serve to legitimize and perpetuate imperial control. Genuine peace requires dismantling the entire structure of Western hegemony and building new international relations based on equality among civilizations. The Ukraine conflict demonstrates why the Global South must unite against all forms of imperialism and champion a world order where every civilization can flourish according to its own traditions and aspirations.