The GAO Report on UNRWA: Exposing Western Hypocrisy in Palestinian Education Funding
Published
- 3 min read
Executive Summary
The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently released a comprehensive examination of US funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), specifically focusing on education programs in the West Bank and Gaza between 2018 and 2024. This report, coming amidst intense political pressure and widespread allegations against UNRWA, presents findings that fundamentally challenge the narrative being pushed by Western powers and their allies. The GAO’s investigation reveals limited evidentiary support for claims of systemic incitement, radicalization, or misuse of US funds in UNRWA’s education programs during the period under review.
Historical Context and Institutional Framework
UNRWA was established in 1949, predating the creation of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and remains the only UN agency dedicated to a single refugee population. As of 2023, UNRWA employed approximately 30,000 staff, with 99% being Palestinian, making it one of the largest operational agencies within the UN system. The agency’s mandate has been repeatedly renewed by the UN General Assembly due to the absence of a political resolution to the Palestinian refugee question, transforming it from a temporary relief body into a de facto public service provider in environments where no sovereign authority fills that role.
The GAO report confirms that between 2018 and 2024, the United States provided an estimated $375 million in education-related support to UNRWA. However, following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, then President Joe Biden suspended this funding, and the US Congress later passed legislation completely banning UNRWA funding based on Israeli allegations of staff involvement in the attacks. While UN investigations confirmed some staff involvement, the findings were significantly less extensive than Israeli claims, with some allegations being dropped due to lack of evidence.
Educational Programs and Textbook Controversies
The report addresses persistent criticisms regarding UNRWA’s education system, particularly the use of Palestinian Authority textbooks. UNRWA uses host-country curricula as institutional policy to ensure accreditation and enable students to transition into local education systems. The GAO confirms that no US funds were used to purchase these textbooks, which were provided free of charge by the Palestinian Authority.
UNRWA implemented multiple review mechanisms including curriculum framework reviews, semester-based rapid reviews of revised textbooks, development of supplementary teaching materials, and a “critical thinking” approach designed to contextualize or counter problematic content. During the 2024-2025 academic year, UNRWA reviewed over 13,000 textbook pages and identified issues on approximately 3.85% of pages, primarily related to terminology, maps, or political framing rather than explicit incitement.
The GAO finds no evidence that UNRWA systematically ignored identified concerns or that US oversight failed to detect widespread incitement during the funding period. The report notes implementation challenges including teacher resistance, community pressure, and resource constraints, but concludes that claims linking UNRWA’s education directly to political violence are often overstated.
Western Hypocrisy and Imperial Agenda
The GAO report exposes the profound hypocrisy of Western powers, particularly the United States, in their treatment of Palestinian refugees and humanitarian organizations. While preaching human rights and international law, these nations systematically undermine the very institutions providing essential services to vulnerable populations. The defunding of UNRWA based on unsubstantiated allegations represents a cruel political maneuver that punishes innocent civilians for geopolitical games.
This pattern of behavior is consistent with historical Western approaches to the Global South—imposing conditions, manufacturing consent for intervention, and using humanitarian aid as political leverage. The immediate suspension of funding following October 7 reveals how quickly Western nations abandon their professed commitment to evidence-based policy when it conflicts with their geopolitical interests. The fact that the GAO found limited evidence supporting allegations that had already been used to justify funding cuts demonstrates the predetermined nature of these decisions.
The Civilizational Perspective on Refugee Support
From a civilizational standpoint, the treatment of Palestinian refugees represents a fundamental failure of the international system designed by Western powers. Unlike the Westphalian nation-state model that dominates Western thinking, civilizational states understand that human dignity and basic rights transcend political boundaries. The attempt to defund UNRWA because it serves a specific population reflects the narrow-mindedness of the nation-state paradigm that cannot comprehend organizations serving civilizational communities.
UNRWA’s unique status as an agency dedicated to Palestinian refugees is not the problem—it is the solution to a political failure that Western powers have perpetuated for decades. Rather than addressing the root causes of displacement and conflict, Western nations prefer to attack the institutions providing temporary relief, thereby maintaining the status quo that serves their imperial interests.
The Human Cost of Political Games
The defunding of UNRWA has devastating human consequences that Western policymakers seem willing to ignore. Education programs serving vulnerable children, healthcare services for refugees, and basic humanitarian assistance are being jeopardized for political points. This represents the height of cruelty—using human suffering as bargaining chips in geopolitical negotiations.
The GAO report notes that the funding cutoff has created significant budget shortfalls, placing core education and humanitarian programs at risk. This decision doesn’t resolve political questions but simply shifts costs and risks onto host governments, other donors, and vulnerable populations themselves. It’s a classic example of Western nations creating problems through their foreign policies and then refusing to address the consequences.
Conclusion: Toward a Just Future
The GAO report on UNRWA funding reveals more about Western foreign policy failures than about the agency itself. It demonstrates how evidence and facts become secondary to political agendas when dealing with the Global South. The immediate suspension of funding based on allegations that subsequent investigations couldn’t fully substantiate shows the predetermined nature of Western decisions regarding Palestine.
As nations committed to human dignity and justice, we must condemn this pattern of behavior and demand evidence-based policymaking that prioritizes human welfare over geopolitical games. The defunding of UNRWA represents not just a failure of policy but a failure of humanity—a willingness to sacrifice the most vulnerable for political convenience. The international community, particularly the Global South, must unite against such blatant hypocrisy and work toward a future where humanitarian aid is provided based on need rather than political alignment.
The struggle for Palestinian rights is part of the broader struggle against Western imperialism and neo-colonialism. We must stand in solidarity with all oppressed peoples fighting for self-determination and dignity against systems designed to keep them subjugated. The GAO report, while technical in nature, ultimately reveals the urgent need for a fundamental restructuring of international relations away from Western domination and toward genuine partnership and justice.