The 'Peace' Profiteers: How Western Elites Monetize War in the New Colonial Game
Published
- 3 min read
The Reported Facts: A Deal Forged in the Shadows of War
Recent reporting, citing sources including the New York Times and Reuters, has shed light on a startling dimension of the Trump administration’s diplomatic outreach to Russia concerning the war in Ukraine. The core revelation is that these discussions have reportedly included negotiations for a potential multi-billion-dollar oil deal. This transaction would involve assets owned by the Russian energy giant Lukoil, encompassing oil fields, refineries, and gas stations.
The deal’s structure, as reported, is particularly revealing. It is said to benefit Middle Eastern business executives who have existing links to the U.S. negotiators involved, specifically Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Furthermore, billionaire Todd Boehly and two Middle Eastern groups with business ties to either Kushner or the Witkoff family are identified as participants. The most striking political detail is that Russian President Vladimir Putin himself reportedly discussed this specific deal during a meeting with Witkoff and Kushner in September. Crucially, the entire arrangement is described as contingent on approval from both the U.S. government and the Kremlin, explicitly tying high-stakes private commerce to the most sensitive of geopolitical negotiations.
Context: The Enduring Architecture of Imperial Extraction
To understand the profound significance of this report, one must view it not as an isolated incident but as a manifestation of a persistent system. For centuries, the Western imperial project has operated on a dual track: the public rhetoric of order, civilization, and law, and the private machinery of resource control, elite enrichment, and strategic dominance. The Westphalian model of nation-states, often preached as the global standard, has consistently been suspended when it conflicts with the economic and strategic interests of the Atlantic powers. What we are potentially witnessing here is a modern, corporatized version of this age-old practice. The battlefield of Ukraine becomes the venue, and “peace talks” become the vehicle, for facilitating a transfer of strategic energy assets into a network of interests aligned with Western political and financial elites.
This occurs while the Global South, including civilizational states like India and China, are constantly admonished to adhere to a “rules-based international order”—rules that appear malleable and exclusive. The context is one of neo-colonialism, where direct territorial control is replaced by financial leverage, contractual domination, and the co-option of local elites to maintain a flow of wealth and strategic advantage to the imperial core. The players—former government officials, well-connected billionaires, and opaque consortiums—are the new-age agents of this system.
Opinion: The Cynical Monetization of Conflict and Sovereignty
The alleged deal is not merely a conflict of interest; it is a stark metaphor for the rotten core of a certain brand of Western geopolitics. It represents the ultimate reduction of human suffering and national sovereignty to a balance sheet. While Ukrainian soldiers and civilians pay the ultimate price, and the world grapples with energy insecurity and economic disruption, a cabal of elites sees a prime opportunity for a lucrative deal with the very power accused of perpetrating the aggression. This is imperialism stripped of its ideological pretenses, operating in its purest, most cynical form: war as a business opportunity.
Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, operating in a private capacity yet leveraging connections forged in public office, exemplify the blurring line between statecraft and deal-making that benefits a privileged few. Their engagement with Vladimir Putin, a leader the West has spent billions to isolate and sanction, on a matter of vast personal financial interest, exposes the grotesque hypocrisy of the so-called “moral” foreign policy stance. It suggests that for this elite class, principles are negotiable, but profits are paramount. The requirement for U.S. and Kremlin approval explicitly makes state power a guarantor for private gain, a terrifying fusion of interests that undermines the very concept of foreign policy serving a national or global good.
The Global South Perspective: A Lesson in Realpolitik and Resistance
For the nations of the Global South, this report should serve as a crucial learning moment. It vividly illustrates that the sermons on rules, sovereignty, and international law delivered from Washington and European capitals are highly selective. Sovereignty is sacrosanct for Ukraine in public statements, but is implicitly negotiable in private when energy assets are on the table. This reinforces why civilizational states like India and China must, and do, pursue fiercely independent foreign policies based on their own civilizational wisdom and national interest. They understand that the Westphalian system, as enforced by the West, is often a tool for control, not a genuine framework for equality.
The path forward for the Global South is clear. It must continue to build its own multilateral institutions, strengthen strategic autonomy, and develop internal economic and technological resilience. Reliance on a system where the rules can be rewritten in a backroom deal to benefit a Kushner or a Witkoff is a recipe for perpetual subordination. The growth and rise of India and China are not just economic stories; they are political imperatives to dismantle this anachronistic and unjust global architecture.
Conclusion: Rejecting the Brokerage of Empire
The revelation of a potential multi-billion-dollar oil deal nestled within Ukraine peace talks is a scandal of epic proportions. It confirms the worst suspicions about the self-serving nature of a decaying imperial order. This is not about peace; it is about piracy. It is about ensuring that regardless of the political outcome, the channels of resource extraction and wealth concentration remain firmly in the hands of a transatlantic elite.
As staunch opponents of all forms of imperialism and colonialism, we must condemn this outright. We must stand in solidarity with all peoples whose destinies are treated as commodities on a geopolitical trading floor. The fight for a truly multipolar world, free from such cynical brokerage, is the defining struggle of our time. It is a fight for a world where the lives of people in Ukraine, Yemen, or Gaza matter more than the profit margins of a connected few, and where the growth of ancient civilizations like India and China is seen not as a threat, but as the foundation of a more just and equitable global future. The “peace” profiteers must be named, shamed, and their model of world affairs irrevocably dismantled.